Twitter’s verified users bristle at Elon Musk’s proposed $20-a-month charge

Journalists — some of whom feel like they are part of what makes the social media site valuable — bristled at the proposed changes.

“I’m not paying Twitter more than I’m paying Netflix every month,” CNBC anchor David Faber said Monday, referencing the streaming giant that sells subscriptions for as low as $6.99 per month. “We have millions of followers. Why should we pay?”

Jim Cramer, Faber’s co-host on “Squawk on the Street,” crowed: “I’m not paying them anything. They should pay me.”

Still, a banker familiar with Twitter’s thinking said charging for verification is the easiest way for the company to quickly make a profit — and argued that for most users who have spent years building their Twitter profile and online brand, shelling out $19.99 a month is a fait accompli.

Freelance journalist Mark Boardman who was verified but having changed username lost the verified status told us “Their should be no cost. I am back using the platform after years off social media focusing on my brand, but would not pay for such a fickle thing”.

“There is no alternative platform for global social discourse,” the banker told The Post. “Are you really going to give it up and start from scratch by not paying $20 a month? You have to go through with it.”

Another insider who has worked with Twitter added that part of the appeal of blue checks is that tweets from verified users are boosted by the site’s algorithm.

One crafty blue-check Twitter user told The Post he already has a contingency plan if his blue check mark is removed: take a screenshot of his current verification status and make it his cover photo or pinned tweet.

In response to Calacanis’ poll, Musk wrote: “Interesting.”